Friday, September 26, 2008

Call of Duty 5

This game of tug of war between two companies is annoying. Call of Duty showed that Activision knows what it is doing and should have the rights to the game. Instead they hand it back to the other company who make a dumb move and go back to WWII. If this game doesn't rewrite WWII history then it will fail. Even if it keeps Multiplayer from the 4th game, still will have a pathetic single player campaign with an extremly predictable ending.

6 comments:

alex j said...

CALL OF DUTY 5 IS A POOPY PANTS FILLED TO THE BRIMS LIKE THEY A GOOD GAME LIKE 4 AND TAKE IT BACK 60 YEARS AND DO WW2 AGAIN IT'S LIKE THEY DIDN'T EVEN SEE HOW MUCH 4 SALL COMPAIRED TO ALL OF THE OTER WW2 GAMES IT'S LIKE THEY WHENT UP A 3 MILES WITH 4 AND TAKE IT BACK 6 MILES WHEN THEY HAD THE IDEA FOR 5 I WOULDEN'T HAVE MINDED IF THEY TOOK SOME TOUGHT INTO AND MANY YOU COULD HAVE BEEN THE AXIS BUT NO YOUR JUST THE ALLIES IN ANOTHER WW2 GAME IT IS JUST UNBEVIBLE .

Makin It Rain All Over!!!!! said...

They should just go to more futureistic weapons. They already had like 2 other WWll games. its stupid

Daverz said...

Not a fan of the game, but the multiplayer is the bulk of it, so if that's good then I don't really care about the rest.

Zach said...

I think they should have made a game about a future war between some countries with futuristic weapons and that stuff. I think that would be cooler than WWII

Joesph G said...

I like the Idea of this game maily because the multiplayer will have a lot more semi automatic guns. This is good because i have a controlor mad and can shoot like it is a MG.

Joesph G said...

Call of Duty 5 owns. The beta was awsome and there are so many cool guns and there is no fire restrictions so I can now shoot faster!